Q
QMindset
Repertory Grid — Mini-Erhebung
Fortschritt

Repertory Grid Mini-Erhebung

Discover your personal understanding of quality. In just 10–15 minutes, you'll explore which associations you make with different quality contexts — and where similarities and differences lie.

🔺

Triad comparison

Three elements are shown. Find what two have in common.

⚖️

Form constructs

Describe the similarity and its opposite.

📊

Rate elements

Position the elements in the range between the two poles of your constructs.

🗺️

Your map

See your quality understanding as an interactive map.

You form up to {{max}} construct pairs. From {{min}} construct pairs onwards you can start the analysis.

How would you like to start?

✍️

Own elicitation

Create your own constructs using the triadic method (10–15 min.)

Start now
⚡

Example dataset

See results directly — based on 12 predefined constructs

Show example
1. Choose two elements
2. Name construct
3. Rate
Round 1 / 12

Which two elements are similar?

Click the two elements that share a quality-related similarity.

1. Triad
2. Construct
3. Rate

Your quality map

Your constructs

All your bipolar constructs — the personal evaluation dimensions through which you perceive quality.

#Left polevs.Right pole
So lesen Sie diese TabelleEinblendenAusblenden

.

2D Biplot — Elements and Constructs

The first two principal components map your quality understanding as a landscape. Elements close together are rated similarly by you. The construct axes show which evaluation criteria point in which direction.

So lesen Sie dieses DiagrammEinblendenAusblenden

Fulfillment score — How close to the ideal?

Each element is projected onto the axis between Worst Case (0%) and Ideal (100%). This gives you an at-a-glance view of the current state of quality awareness in you or your organization — and how it has changed compared to 5 years ago.

So lesen Sie dieses DiagrammEinblendenAusblenden

Wählen Sie im Druckdialog „Als PDF speichern“. Ihre Daten bleiben dabei auf Ihrem Gerät.